Maslow Search

Speaking of 'nOdd needs, I have posting issues.
But in regards to Maslow blog search, I also need a Need list.
As Maslow stands.
Need as found 12-16-11
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX
XXI

Now I should note that "pop" quiz has never been graded, in terms of testing my G'Ribble, that there are changes to the search al gore rhythms. i.e. at a later date will the same search find the same sources. I know I have referenced Maslow but then maybe it was too embedded.  Here is a google find.

The Tetrahedron of Will

This page is under repair.(6-8-26)

1/18/07:   Hit and Run Gang  seems to be my earliest use of the Tetrahedron of Will

Now I must (thanks to Meta or other AI) reference others who used it. See previous post. 

Arthur Young. Abraham Maslow.

*Maslow, I knew before the geometric projection.  Arthur Young,after the development of my tetrahedron. 

Already credited Einstein and Plato.   

Must add: Kant, Hegel, Hume, Mill. 

R. Buckminster Fuller.  (In this case a belated credit but right after Plato.   

The Republic I represented in a book report in Junior High. And in High School I attended an assembly with R. Buckminster Fuller, the guest.

*Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: a triangle.

 

5/16/26

Another name and categorical is Emerson and the Existentialists and Romantics.  

Footnotes Page Two JUNE 2014

Re:b.s.[!] (FP2)  Check Heading [i.e. (s.c.) FP2 above]
2B FP2 6-4-14
(hegel+popper) Too Random..., (fp1), Reigning Wags and Tales., Knot 2B3, (fp2,11-13).
(maslow+needs) Maslow Search , TruthOut.org
(heirarchy) Intelligence Gathering, Battle of Amendments?, C. BLANK NETWORK, D. Ditto Heads Unite!, Post-Pyth?.
Speaking of Rhodes. (It was under my radar)

Battle of Amendments?

Or Balance of Fittest ?

Related Flak [?]

[Reboot Reading List]
[No compunction or qualms with how others connect the dots ?]

This in no way* intends to imply that the amendments have any intention of being in any heirarchy, priority or clause.**

* nor weigh ?   [a Lean Forward, b  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (b), c, d Ghost of X-mas Passed. , e One Heckuva Day. , f, g It's Obama's Turn , h The Fighting Ill Lie Nigh! , i Social Darwinism 2.0[!] , j Now this is the ticket. , k Weird Google of the Day. , l Speaking of Bowls, m X & Y Chromo Somes]
** (s.c.) scroll click[Maslow, clause(b.s.), wits]
[Reading List, RE:VIEWING, Reading List (UC) ]

[Face the Music ! ? ! (cheer/leader/ship/?)]

The General Theory of Karl Rove

And The Relative Specialty*  of President Obama!





A.  The General Theory: Attack what works!

B.  The Theory of Special Relativity: Congress makes the laws!





The General Theory of Karl Rove: *Attack what works*. The Theory of Special Relativity of Obama. "Congress makes the laws, and he can't rein(or reign o'r) cats or dogs.* (partial translation: laws are a product of committee think) It is not surprising that it is difficulty reading and two courts can read it different.
...
And congress can Bane or...
---
Focus/Highlight: 2nd Video w/ Chris Hayes 
BTW: don't count on my physics but who knows?


*[Rough draft in progress.]
Q ED
6th edgy?


7-30-14
PARDON MY SPACIOUSNESS: WINDOWS/EXPLORER COMPATABILITY ANOMALY


Maslow's[?] woah.

FC "Hammer"

Just the two of us?
Just because you have a hammer, everything is not a nail!*
See 3 PO

*Rookiepedia?(not wookie weally^ nor babawawa)
(fn)
True dat ? % $ (day oh?)



^ final insert (post image & F1-3)

[But really, the public option^^ is not just the health care but the democracy. Not to cap and trade or recycle old memes, but to reframe. Cap and trade is a term that may be DOA, but it is the congress and the market stupid.]
^^ returning to text later, not to un context but conn text in the form of revisiting footnotes for Hammer Time/Maslow Try Angle.  Heck, this is good enough for trickle down or bubble up. You google or wiki and U-tubes. (or scroll over and click)
[Editors Note:  Photo is mine from 88Keys, I told you everything was relative.[^^^] See(labels)/CtrlF Olympus D-550 (image-#5) shot # 2 (can still use a zoom and crop later)]

[^^^]: as I recall this is where I had an earlier mis-insert. i.e. elative(sic)
Note: Missing link caught 11-10-12 & there are two separate links under [^^^]'s.
Result: r"elative" link returned to earlier unintended insert, hopefully now "as was".

11-22-12 [C-VC]

C#PO(correction) C3PO

[FOOTNOTES (#3) NOVEMBER 2012]
Scroll down for most recent.

[Posted 11-8-12] F'n 3 point oh?
Footnotes on Tan Gents. 
C 4* congress?
Conn Sciousness?
* 4 mat review ?
Not?

11-30-12 "the boat we are all in."
UNDERCONSTRUCTION or_RE_DE_: PROGRESS and CONGRESS
"all"= (b.s.)"golden + rule"
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/05/golden-rule-in-progress.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2004/09/running-on-what-rhetorical.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/10/what-me-worry.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2006/09/1st-thing-that-went-wrong.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/04/tetra-heed-ron.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/04/inconvenient-segue.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/01/martin-luther-king-jr-day.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/06/hi-ate-us.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/06/ideology.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/05/justice.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/01/on-level.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2010/06/just-to-clarify.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/05/taking-bear-by-horns.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/10/tetrahedron-ramble.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2006/11/mess-age-is-message.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2006/10/whatsoever-man-soweth.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2004/09/stuart-smally-anyone.html
(b.s.) works in* mysterious** ways.
* a, b, c, d, e
** a, d, c, x, e, y (alpha-ibid-zed and why!)
Note: only covered the "all" & "in", these are the links that works at this time, and may leave "boat"(cats + dogs) and "we" 4 later.***
*** actually that is all there R : The (b.s.) of "we" is "4" now and "works"!!!!!!

11-9-12 (fn) too  much ? [!]
Labels Ouch "cap that" M-beds.(CONN Sciousness) Jung, Nietzsche, Maslow (Transition of Sorts)

11-10-12: UNqEd/reCap(l5) =/aka line five not LXV but that is pound too Roman. i.e. Ibid. of sorts.
Furhter editors note:
Fup='d "follow up"
There are presently 3 footnotes for November w/hope to keep it that way.
This 4mat was begun in September I think.
There are presently 11 links with 33 [CtrlF]"Ibid"'s@(b.s.)"Ibid" as follows,
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/12/flow-of-conscience.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/08/inet.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/08/republicans-cuts-and-runs.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/07/too-cubed-viii.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/09/politics-is-local.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/09/out-foxed.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/09/footnotes-september-2012.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/06/ideology.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2011/02/report-from-sabbatical.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/12/rubrics-cube-and-rhetorical.html

 

TruthOut.org

The truth is that I stumbled upon Cognitive Policy Works * through my registration** with TruthOut.org and I was too busy not working on my own Wage-Productivity Gap to run out in time to get the last printed copy of the Seattle Post Intelligencer.

Where was I going with this? Just unpackaging or repackaging "on the fly" as the CPW's Joe Brewer might say, or my yet to read William Rivers Pitt and maybe back to my use of allegory and metaphor and a need*** to be more productive.

* today's reading inserted here, actual original stumble was here.

** email updates are a valuable filter(sign-up and contribute if you can)

*** and finally my point I did not know I has heading for, a contribution to the dialogue: In the power of belief over facts and needs over wants. (Maslow)

Culture 10 Files

From the Ship of Foils[!]

Rhetorical lede or ship?
The daily dot[?] http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/donald-trump-drags-mark-zuckerberg-into-immigration-fight/ar-CCLMb?ocid=OIE9HP
Frank ‘n Stein? 
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/trending/tt-BBlSteL?q=rene%20anand%20brain&form=PTTWNE&ocid=OIE9HP

Amazon dot culture?
Bridging the Law of Un-intended Consequences.
Pay more, search local[?]

... 
Corporations are not evil. 

What is evil?  Lack of or misuse of goods.  The lack of nexus between Adam Smith’s two tomes.  People as goods.  Lack of Maslow’s Mitt Flop!  (Heirarchy of Needs.)   
Or TE HE…

F'N 3

Update Labels.
My Images: Review of Recent
Gitmo or less.(HeGel Try Angle), 

 

Ear Rock, Ear Ron,(Subjective/Objective d'ow) 

Change Logos (RYGB)DeltaLogos(Economics, Hume, Or us, Politics)

Ghost Busters (4TetraHedrons)
Speculative Physics (Original 4-sided-die.)(Not my Maslow)
Wittgenstein (Secondary Die?)

Secondary Edgy's 
The Physics of the DOW
Rough Philosophy (Venn History)
On any given day? 3Models(Environment)~
A Place To Ponder 3Models(Environment)~
Bricks and stones (Politics, Economics, Religion, Culture)~

*

Pre-Capitalization

(fn)TOO Point OH[!] (Politics, Economics, Religion, Culture)~

~
* uncertain of origional insert (found in image archive)
Feels Like Tetra Spirit [!]

Outgoing but divided

The irony that the most liberal Republican would lose to a Democrat with the name Whitehouse, Senator Lincoln Chafee anounced:
"The people have spoken all across America. They want the Democrats and Republicans to work together," he said. "I think the president now is going to have to talk to the Democrats. I think that’s going to be good for America."

Or possible good omen for Democrats as Vilsack anounces bid for White House.

I must note a distinction a caller brought out of Ed Shultz on the issue of "divided government". Although we understand that Democrats are needed in the House and Senate to balance the Republican in the White House, Ed meant that divided government to him means simply a Legislative, Judicial and Executive branch that "do their job"(I believe my words). In fact this is my paraphrase and extension, but I also add that my opinion for divided government is that Democrats represent the people and may still have more than one perspective.

When the first 100 hours and 100 days have passed there will still be hard work, because other perspectives can never be "wiped off the political landscape" as Jack Abramoff is believed to have said.

I believe Bush called the ideological war the calling of our time, it is only a snooze alarm. Perspectives must be listened to.

As Abraham Maslow is reported to have said: "Authoritarians must be converted or they must be excluded." While that may seem to apply to other categories, that would be Authoritarian. Where I was going is "War is(only) a last resort". That is my (D)evolution.